Determining What’s True

Outline

  1. Determining What’s True
    1. Articulate the Question
    2. Frame Competing Positions
    3. Formulate the Arguments
    4. Evaluate the Arguments
    5. Judge Epistemic Status
  2. Addendum
    1. Fact-Checking
    2. Alternative Ways of Knowing
    3. Epistemic Pitfalls
    4. Why People Have Irrational Beliefs
    5. Rationalization
    6. Argument Diagrams
      1. Capital Punishment
      2. News Media Bias

Determining What’s True

  1. Articulate the question at issue
  2. Frame competing positions on the question
  3. Formulate the arguments for and against the positions
  4. Evaluate the arguments
  5. Judge the epistemic status of the positions
    • that is, whether the positions are certain, beyond a reasonable doubt, likely, an open question, doubtful, impossible

Articulate the Question

  • For example
    • Was Biden legitimately elected?
    • Has there been a rapid increase in Earth’s average surface temperature since the mid-20th century, due primarily to greenhouse gases injected into the atmosphere by human activity?
    • What happens to you when you die?
    • What caused the Tunguska Event?
    • Is the United States systemically racist?
  • Questions should be expressed rather than merely referred to.
    • For example
      • Has there been a rapid increase in Earth’s average surface temperature since the mid-20th century, due primarily to greenhouse gases injected into the atmosphere by human activity
        • versus
      • The question of global warming
  • It’s better to express a question in open-ended form, other things being equal.
    • Closed-ended Questions
      • Is, Will, Was, Does, Did, Do, ……
    • Open-ended Questions
      • Why, How, What, When, Where……
  • The reason is that closed-ended questions risk lumping different hypotheses together and conflating arguments.
  • Examples
    • Beginning of Human Life
      • Does human life begin at conception?
        • Versus
      • When does human life begin?
    • Existence of God
      • Does God exist?
        • Versus
      • What supernatural beings exist?
    • Afterlife
      • Is there an afterlife?
        • Versus
      • What happens to you when you die?

Frame Competing Positions

  • For example, what happens to you when you die?
    • You cease to exist, never to be conscious again
    • You are reincarnated as a human, animal, or spirit
    • You assume a different mode existence while retaining your sense of self
    • You merge with the Divine

Formulate the Arguments

  • An argument is a piece of reasoning, from premises to a conclusion.

Kinds

  • A Deductive Argument is an argument from premises to a logical consequence.
    • For example,
      • John Oliver is not eligible to be president because he’s not a natural-born U.S. citizen (and only natural-born U.S. citizens are eligible).
    • View Deductive Arguments
  • An Evidential Argument is an argument from evidence to a probable hypothesis
    • Two kinds
      • reliable-process argument is an argument whose conclusion is (purportedly) made probable by a reliable process.
        • For example:
          • The suspect’s fingers were in contact with the murder weapon because the suspect’s fingerprints match those on the murder weapon (and a fingerprint match is reliable evidence that the fingerprints belong to the same person).
      • An abductive argument is an argument whose conclusion is (purportedly) made probable by explaining and/or predicting the evidence.
        • For example:
          • Thomas Jefferson likely fathered some of Sally Hemings’ children because that’s the best explanation of her children’s physical appearance and a one-in-thousand Y-chromosome match between a male descendant of Jefferson’s paternal uncle and a male descendant of one of Hemings’ sons.
    • View Evidential Arguments
  • An analogical argument is an inference from known similarities to a further similarity
    • For example:
      • Your house will likely sell for about $400,000 because it’s very similar to three recently-sold houses nearby that sold for about that amount.

Other Examples

  • Afterlife
    • Human beings lose consciousness when their brains are deprived of oxygen.
    • When human beings die their brains are permanently deprived of oxygen, since blood no longer flows to the brain.
    • Therefore, human beings permanently lose consciousness when they die.
  • Global Warming
    • Earth is warming.
    • The only plausible explanation of Earth’s warming is the increase in atmospheric greenhouse gases.
    • The only plausible explanation of the increase in atmospheric greenhouse gases is human activity.
    • Therefore, the only plausible explanation for the Earth’s warming is the increase in atmospheric greenhouse gases due to human activity.

View Arguments

Evaluate the Arguments

  • Example
    • Argument
      • If Biden had won the 2020 presidential election, it’s unlikely that Trump would have won 5 times the number of counties.
      • But Trump won 2588 counties to Biden’s 511.
      • Therefore it’s unlikely Biden won the election.
    • First Flaw: The argument is deductively invalid
      • Refutation by Logical Analogy
        • If a bingo ball were randomly selected from a cage of 75 balls, it’s unlikely the ball would be number 25.
        • The ball selected was number 25.
        • Therefore it’s unlikely the ball was randomly selected from a cage of 75 balls.
    • Second Flaw: First premise is false.
      • It’s not unlikely that Trump would have won 5 times the number of counties since “Democrats tend to win in densely populated counties, while Republicans win more sparse, rural counties.”
        • Number of Counties Won in Presidential Election Doesn’t Determine Outcome factcheck.org

Judge Epistemic Status

  • The epistemic status of a position is the degree to which it’s supported by the arguments.
  • David Hume, 1758
    • “In our reasonings concerning matter of fact, there are all imaginable degrees of assurance, from the highest certainty to the lowest species of [probable] evidence. A wise man, therefore, proportions his belief to the evidence.”

Basic Epistemic Statuses:

  • Examples:
    • It’s certain that 2+2=4.
    • It’s beyond a reasonable doubt that Biden was legitimately elected president.
    • In all likelihood Oswald acted alone in assassinating President Kennedy.
    • Echinacea probably does not prevent colds.
    • It’s reasonable to believe that Jefferson fathered at least some of Sally Hemings’ children.
    • The Tunguska Event of 1908 was most likely caused by a meteor.
    • The idea that the CIA assassinated Kennedy is farfetched.
    • The nature of dark matter is an open question.
    • It’s impossible that Frederick Douglass founded the NAACP.  

View Epistemic Status

Addendum

Fact-Checking
  • Fact-checkers rate claims true, false, misleading, and unsupported by evaluating the arguments pro and con.

View Fact-Checking

Alternative Ways of Knowing
  • The Claim
    • Some people know things other than by rational argument, e.g. through faith, intuition, divine revelation, or mystical experience.
  • The Problem
    • Knowing something through faith, intuition, divine revelation, or mystical experience requires that such ways of knowing are reliable sources of truth.  But establishing reliability requires a rational argument.
Epistemic Pitfalls

Reasoning can go awry in many ways.

View Epistemic Pitfalls

Why People Have Irrational Beliefs
  • They believe what they want or need to be true
  • They jump to conclusions, knowing only part of the story.
  • They live inside epistemic bubbles to protect deeply-held beliefs.
  • They come under the sway of a “charismatic authority.”

View Why People Have Irrational Beliefs

Rationalization

A rationalization is an argument, developed after the fact, supporting an opinion a person already holds or an action they’ve already taken.

  • Merriam-Webster
    • Rationalize means to bring into accord with reason or cause something to seem reasonable.
Argument Diagrams
Capital Punishment

View Capital Punishment

News Media Bias

View Bias