Outline
Determining What’s True
- Articulate the question at issue
- Frame competing positions on the question
- Formulate the arguments for and against the positions
- Evaluate the arguments
- Judge the epistemic status of the positions
- that is, whether the positions are certain, beyond a reasonable doubt, likely, an open question, doubtful, impossible
Articulate the Question
- For example
- Was Biden legitimately elected?
- Has there been a rapid increase in Earth’s average surface temperature since the mid-20th century, due primarily to greenhouse gases injected into the atmosphere by human activity?
- What happens to you when you die?
- What caused the Tunguska Event?
- Is the United States systemically racist?
- Questions should be expressed rather than merely referred to.
- For example
- Has there been a rapid increase in Earth’s average surface temperature since the mid-20th century, due primarily to greenhouse gases injected into the atmosphere by human activity
- versus
- The question of global warming
- Has there been a rapid increase in Earth’s average surface temperature since the mid-20th century, due primarily to greenhouse gases injected into the atmosphere by human activity
- For example
- It’s better to express a question in open-ended form, other things being equal.
- Closed-ended Questions
- Is, Will, Was, Does, Did, Do, ……
- Open-ended Questions
- Why, How, What, When, Where……
- Closed-ended Questions
- The reason is that closed-ended questions risk lumping different hypotheses together and conflating arguments.
- Examples
- Beginning of Human Life
- Does human life begin at conception?
- Versus
- When does human life begin?
- Does human life begin at conception?
- Existence of God
- Does God exist?
- Versus
- What supernatural beings exist?
- Does God exist?
- Afterlife
- Is there an afterlife?
- Versus
- What happens to you when you die?
- Is there an afterlife?
- Beginning of Human Life
Frame Competing Positions
- For example, what happens to you when you die?
- You cease to exist, never to be conscious again
- You are reincarnated as a human, animal, or spirit
- You assume a different mode existence while retaining your sense of self
- You merge with the Divine
Formulate the Arguments
- An argument is a piece of reasoning, from premises to a conclusion.
Kinds
- A Deductive Argument is an argument from premises to a logical consequence.
- For example,
- John Oliver is not eligible to be president because he’s not a natural-born U.S. citizen (and only natural-born U.S. citizens are eligible).
- View Deductive Arguments
- For example,
- An Evidential Argument is an argument from evidence to a probable hypothesis
- Two kinds
- A reliable-process argument is an argument whose conclusion is (purportedly) made probable by a reliable process.
- For example:
- The suspect’s fingers were in contact with the murder weapon because the suspect’s fingerprints match those on the murder weapon (and a fingerprint match is reliable evidence that the fingerprints belong to the same person).
- For example:
- An abductive argument is an argument whose conclusion is (purportedly) made probable by explaining and/or predicting the evidence.
- For example:
- Thomas Jefferson likely fathered some of Sally Hemings’ children because that’s the best explanation of her children’s physical appearance and a one-in-thousand Y-chromosome match between a male descendant of Jefferson’s paternal uncle and a male descendant of one of Hemings’ sons.
- For example:
- A reliable-process argument is an argument whose conclusion is (purportedly) made probable by a reliable process.
- View Evidential Arguments
- Two kinds
- An analogical argument is an inference from known similarities to a further similarity
- For example:
- Your house will likely sell for about $400,000 because it’s very similar to three recently-sold houses nearby that sold for about that amount.
- For example:
Other Examples
- Afterlife
- Human beings lose consciousness when their brains are deprived of oxygen.
- When human beings die their brains are permanently deprived of oxygen, since blood no longer flows to the brain.
- Therefore, human beings permanently lose consciousness when they die.
- Global Warming
- Earth is warming.
- The only plausible explanation of Earth’s warming is the increase in atmospheric greenhouse gases.
- The only plausible explanation of the increase in atmospheric greenhouse gases is human activity.
- Therefore, the only plausible explanation for the Earth’s warming is the increase in atmospheric greenhouse gases due to human activity.
View Arguments
Evaluate the Arguments
- Example
- Argument
- If Biden had won the 2020 presidential election, it’s unlikely that Trump would have won 5 times the number of counties.
- But Trump won 2588 counties to Biden’s 511.
- Therefore it’s unlikely Biden won the election.
- First Flaw: The argument is deductively invalid
- Refutation by Logical Analogy
- If a bingo ball were randomly selected from a cage of 75 balls, it’s unlikely the ball would be number 25.
- The ball selected was number 25.
- Therefore it’s unlikely the ball was randomly selected from a cage of 75 balls.
- Refutation by Logical Analogy
- Second Flaw: First premise is false.
- It’s not unlikely that Trump would have won 5 times the number of counties since “Democrats tend to win in densely populated counties, while Republicans win more sparse, rural counties.”
- Number of Counties Won in Presidential Election Doesn’t Determine Outcome factcheck.org
- It’s not unlikely that Trump would have won 5 times the number of counties since “Democrats tend to win in densely populated counties, while Republicans win more sparse, rural counties.”
- Argument
Judge Epistemic Status
- The epistemic status of a position is the degree to which it’s supported by the arguments.
- David Hume, 1758
- “In our reasonings concerning matter of fact, there are all imaginable degrees of assurance, from the highest certainty to the lowest species of [probable] evidence. A wise man, therefore, proportions his belief to the evidence.”
Basic Epistemic Statuses:

- Examples:
- It’s certain that 2+2=4.
- It’s beyond a reasonable doubt that Biden was legitimately elected president.
- In all likelihood Oswald acted alone in assassinating President Kennedy.
- Echinacea probably does not prevent colds.
- It’s reasonable to believe that Jefferson fathered at least some of Sally Hemings’ children.
- The Tunguska Event of 1908 was most likely caused by a meteor.
- The idea that the CIA assassinated Kennedy is farfetched.
- The nature of dark matter is an open question.
- It’s impossible that Frederick Douglass founded the NAACP.
View Epistemic Status
Addendum
Fact-Checking
- Fact-checkers rate claims true, false, misleading, and unsupported by evaluating the arguments pro and con.
View Fact-Checking
Alternative Ways of Knowing
- The Claim
- Some people know things other than by rational argument, e.g. through faith, intuition, divine revelation, or mystical experience.
- The Problem
- Knowing something through faith, intuition, divine revelation, or mystical experience requires that such ways of knowing are reliable sources of truth. But establishing reliability requires a rational argument.
Epistemic Pitfalls
Reasoning can go awry in many ways.
View Epistemic Pitfalls
Why People Have Irrational Beliefs
- They believe what they want or need to be true
- They jump to conclusions, knowing only part of the story.
- They live inside epistemic bubbles to protect deeply-held beliefs.
- They come under the sway of a “charismatic authority.”
View Why People Have Irrational Beliefs
Rationalization
A rationalization is an argument, developed after the fact, supporting an opinion a person already holds or an action they’ve already taken.
- Merriam-Webster
- Rationalize means to bring into accord with reason or cause something to seem reasonable.
Argument Diagrams
Capital Punishment

View Capital Punishment
News Media Bias

View Bias